Fixing Appointments

“Nothing can help a church as much as a good appointment,” a Bishop once said to me.

I agree. But not in the way that the Bishop meant.

As this United Methodist appointment season spins towards its conclusion and conferences aim toward the moment when the appointments are “fixed,” there is a stronger meaning of itineracy and appointments that we should explore.

They left their boats and followed Him.

They left their boats and followed Him.

Itineracy has come to mean a commitment for United Methodist Pastors to go where they are sent to further the mission of the church to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world. It is a good meaning, as far as it goes. But the practice of itineracy is inadequate simply because it no longer is adequately delivering the disciple-making goods in the mission fields to which pastors are being appointed.

Here is an idea that used to beautifully make disciples and is working again – where it is actually attempted.

Itinerating Preacher

Keeping an Appointment

Itineracy and appointments had a different meaning in the first 100 years of the Methodist movement. Itineracy meant moving from place to place, but not at 5 year intervals to a church building. Itineracy meant following Wesley’s example of preaching five times a day in specific places with specific people at an appointed hour. When we read Wesley’s instructions to preachers about being punctual, it was to be at the appointed place on time when the host had gathered a (usually small) body of people.

Thousands of itinerating preachers and lay servants paid punctual, fervent and diligent attention to disciple-making appointments several times a day for a hundred years. That is how the Methodist movement claimed the devotion of a third of the population of the United States.

Very few people in the United States are about this kind of commitment to daily itineracy and disciple-making appointments in the Methodist movement. It is sadly neglected in every prescription for the recovery of the North American Methodist movement.

Disciple Making Appointment

Disciple Making Appointment

The idea is easy to grasp. Spend our time systematically meeting people on a daily basis in our mission field with the intention of helping them find their way to Christ and the church. No one I know was trained to itinerate this way in Seminary or residency. Few are advocating this kind of intentional practice and even fewer are actually trying it.

It was a rare practice in Wesley and Asbury’s day as well. No Anglican priest was trained to itinerate but then Wesley changed the rules. Perhaps it is time for us to change the rules again.

Nothing can help a church as much as a lot of good disciple-making appointments at homes, businesses, parks, coffee shops, on the street, and, only if absolutely necessary, in a church building. Try it and you’ll see the lovely relationships that develop and the disciples that begin to grow out of those relationships. It is life giving for you and for the people with whom you are making these daily appointments.

I’m working with some great partners and a few dozen United Methodist pastors and churches who are giving it a try.

Want to join us?

Send me an e-mail – steve@goseelove.org

3 comments
  1. Steve, you and your readers might enjoy this point/counterpoint that I had with a DS from Tennessee over itinerancy. Your take is interesting. I’ll be looking forward to what you and Jim’s group come up with. I maintain that a modified call system could handle the freight of deploying clergy without many of the faults we see because we have made itinerancy a sacred cow.

    https://viamediamethodists.wordpress.com/2015/04/19/3-reasons-why-itinerancy-is-an-idea-whose-time-has-come-and-gone-umc/

    https://viamediamethodists.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/guest-post-itinerancy-a-response/

  2. Great article.As a professional genealogist, as well as United Methodist Clergy, I researched my small family tree back many generation. From 1810 to 1840 there were either 5 or 7 Methodist clergy from my family background. These were the years which the late Dr. James Logan of Wesley Seminary, called “The Golden Age of Methodism.” They were all members of the South Carolina Conference which stretched from South Carolina to Northern Florida. At that time appointments were for ONE year only. Not just one out of four or five years. These were circuit riding clergy. One of the most famous was Tillman Dixon Peurifoy, whose family was attacked by Indians while serving as a “Missionary” in the area which is now near Tallahassee, Florida. His children were killed, wife stabbed, scalped, and left for dead. She survived and they went on to have 12 more children. Brother Peurifoy, as he was known was attending to his itinerant ministry when the family was attacked. One of the two children was Loric Pierce Peurifoy, named for another Methodist Pastor. Later he would name another son Capers Peurifoy, named after William Capers, a friend and later Bishop of the South Carolina Conference. Another was James Yarbrough Peurifoy who went on to help organize the Congregational Methodist Church, which still exist today, mostly in South Carolina and Georgia. Like the Protestant Methodist of the Middle Atlantic States they would not accept the authority of Bishops. While the Protestant Methodist became part of the Methodist Union of 1938 the Congregational Methodist never joined and are mostly unknown to most United Methodist. As I have read, them men and their families endured much hardship, lost off family, disease. Their average time of ministry was usually ten years or less.
    Too often we think we have it hard now. Try going back 200 years and see the trials these early Circuit riders had in their ministry. They were not there to pamper people, but to truly make disciples.

Add Comment

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>